Back in March, I reported at the CMS ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance meeting that the expected financial impact of the conversion to ICD-10 for a typical Medicare inpatient case mix was -0.04% — that is, about $4 less on each $10,000 of reimbursement. I reminded the audience several times that such a tiny amount is statistically zero, since the study’s sampling error is at least 0.10%.
The report was based on several things particular to the Medicare setting in which I gave the talk: Continue reading
Donna and Sue are joined this month by fellow 3M HIS blogger Jill Devrick.
Donna: Hi Sue. How was the AHIMA-AHDI summit? Didn’t you give a presentation?
Sue: The summit was really good, and yes, Jill Devrick and I gave a presentation on how CDI professionals and Healthcare Documentation Specialists can work together to improve the content of the medical record in light of the transition to ICD-10.
Donna: So tell me more…
Sue: You know what, let’s get Jill on the line and we can both tell you about it… Continue reading
This blog assumes you have read part 1, so if you haven’t, see you back here in a few minutes. Part 2 is for those of you in specialties where the number of codes has gone up significantly—orthopedists, OB/GYN docs and oncologists—it takes a bit more work to build a cheat sheet of reasonable size. I called it an “interesting challenge” in Part 1 of this blog, but it’s doable.
After accessing the Tabular.pdf (see instructions in part 1), I would recommend you first take half an hour and do an eyeball review of your specialty’s home base chapter without copying or pasting any codes (you might have to review sections of multiple chapters if your specialty doesn’t have a single home base). This will help you see what you are up against, and help you apply the two principles I introduce below. Continue reading
Did you end up here because you haven’t done squat about ICD-10, and you googled “ICD-10 cheat sheet?” Fantastic. Come on in, there’s plenty of room. I could get all high and mighty about cheat sheets, but by temperament I am practically allergic to telling people what to do. So, if you want to stick with the cheat sheet for coding in ICD-10, I will not try to talk you out of it. Continue reading
The latest from CMS and AMA on July 6, 2015 is a bit confusing – I agree. But a clarification was released yesterday.
In case you missed the July 6, 2015 release, CMS and the AMA announced an effort to work together to help Part B providers under the Physician Fee Schedule prepare for ICD-10. CMS recognized some physician and other professional providers need additional help. To assist in the transition, CMS announced “Medicare review contractors will not deny physician or other practitioner claims billed under Part B physician fee schedule through either automated medical review or complex medical record review based solely on the specificity of the ICD-10 diagnosis code as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family. Continue reading
If you have the slightest inclination to freak out about ICD-10 because change makes you nervous, please ignore this blog.
Okay, now for the rest of you: the code sets have been frozen for more years than is good for them, and once we get to “thaw” the code sets, they need to be updated. How can that be, you say? ICD-10-CM/PCS is brand spanking new. No, not exactly—not new, unused. New and unused are not the same thing. Putting meat in the freezer does not make it fresh—it lets you put off cooking it for a while. Continue reading
Posted in ICD-10
Tagged CMS, coding, ICD-10
Donna: You know Sue, I think that people are really stepping up their ICD-10 game as we enter the home stretch.
Sue: The way I look at it, they’ve been stepping up their game for the last five years!
Donna: So true. Still, I’ve received a lot of emails lately from coding and CDI professional requesting assistance with ICD-10 queries that they can use to ensure they have ICD-10 ready documentation.
Sue: So what kinds of queries are they asking about? Continue reading
A 37-year old male with a long-standing history of the diagnosis of gender identity disorder is currently undergoing counseling and medical therapy in an effort to work toward physically modifying his body to better match his psychological gender identity. The patient is scheduled to undergo an orchiectomy penectomy and surgical construction of a vagina in the near future.
Assign the ICD-10-CM code for the diagnosis of gender identity disorder.
What ICD-10-PCS code will be used for the procedure of a surgical construction of a vagina using autologous tissue procedure for this patient? Continue reading
The team I work with has done an enormous amount of work translating medical necessity policies from ICD-9 to ICD-10. And we have had many discussions regarding the codes that represent “unspecified” care in ICD-10. Should they stay in the translations – or go? Is ICD-10 specific enough to cover all care and coding contingencies now?
An internet search (don’t you love being able to search so easily?) revealed:
Un-spec-i-fied: (adjective) meaning “not stated clearly or exactly”. Synonyms: unnamed, unstated, unidentified, undesignated, undefined, unfixed, undecided, undetermined, uncertain… Continue reading
Donna: Sue, what results are you hearing about ICD-10 coder agreement as sites get ready to implement October 1, 2015?
Sue: What do you mean by “ICD-10 coder agreement?”
Donna: Well, as hospitals are in the homestretch of their ICD-10 preparation activities, one of the things they’re doing is having all of their coding staff code the same cases in ICD-10 so they can compare results. Continue reading